Sudanese diaspora communities and international human rights organizations have voiced strong opposition to the United Arab Emirates’ nomination of diplomat Lana Nusseibeh for the position of United Nations Secretary-General. Critics question her independence and suitability for the role, citing her previous defense of the UAE against allegations of supporting Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
Nusseibeh’s candidacy to succeed António Guterres, whose term ends this year, has sparked controversy amidst ongoing concerns regarding the UAE’s alleged involvement in Sudan’s civil war. Human rights organizations and observers have frequently raised allegations that the UAE has provided support to the RSF, which faces accusations of committing atrocities against civilians. The RSF’s attack on El Fasher in October 2025 was described by the UN as having genocidal characteristics.
Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese women’s rights and pro-democracy activist, warned that endorsing Nusseibeh’s nomination could hinder justice efforts for victims of atrocities in Sudan. Other activists echoed these concerns, suggesting that her appointment might erode public confidence in the UN. Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, criticized Nusseibeh’s past responses to allegations about UAE support for the RSF, arguing that her stance raises concerns about her commitment to accountability.
In defense of her candidacy, Nusseibeh has condemned the RSF’s actions as atrocious and pledged to support UN fact-finding missions and transitional justice initiatives if appointed. She has taken leave from her ministerial role in the UAE, highlighting the independence required of a UN Secretary-General.
The selection process for the next Secretary-General involves obtaining at least nine affirmative votes from the 15-member UN Security Council, while avoiding a veto from any of its five permanent members: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France, and Russia. The race remains competitive, with candidates like former Costa Rican vice-president Rebeca Grynspan having emerged as potential front-runners in previous informal polls.
As the debate over Nusseibeh’s nomination continues, the situation underscores broader concerns about the independence of international institutions and their capacity to ensure accountability for alleged human rights violations during conflicts.